Case LawHigh Court › Income Tax Appeal v. Abhay Ahuja, Jj

Income Tax Appeal v. Abhay Ahuja, Jj

High Court 12 Aug 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Income Tax Appeal v. Abhay Ahuja, Jj
Date of order
12 Aug 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Income Tax Appeal v. Abhay Ahuja, Jj, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 2In that view of the matter, the Appeal is dismissed as having beenrendered infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.858 OF 2018 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-10,Mumbai, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road,Mumbai-400 020…Appellant Versus Nivea India Pvt. Ltd.Hyde Park, 3[rd] Floor,Saki Vihar Road, Andheri East,Mumbai-400 072.PAN : …Respondent …Respondent *** Mr. Vikas T. Khanchandani i/b Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma for the Appellant.Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the Respondent. *** CORAM :DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ. P. C. : DATE : 12 AUGUST 2022 .It is contended by Mr. Jasani, learned Counsel for the Respondentthat the present Appeal is rendered infructuous on account of the fact thatthe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “J” Bench, Mumbai has finally decidedthe Appeal, which was pending before it vide Order dated 3 March 2020.Counsel for the Appellant does not dispute this fact. A copy of the Orderdated 3 March 2020 is produced in Court and is directed to be taken onrecord. 2In that view of the matter, the Appeal is dismissed as having beenrendered infructuous. (ABHAY AHUJA, J.) (DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.) RAJESHDigitally signed byRAJESH VASANTVASANTCHITTEWANCHITTEWANDate: 2022.08.1718:50:26 +0530
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan