Income Tax Appeal St v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-6(3), Nagpur
High Court
08 Mar 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Income Tax Appeal St v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-6(3), Nagpur
Date of order
08 Mar 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Income Tax Appeal St v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-6(3), Nagpur, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Decision: DATED:8-3-2023 For reasons stated, we allow the applicationseeking condonation of delay.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 cat 2.2023.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.
Civil Application (CAT) No. 2 of 2023
in
Income Tax Appeal St. No. 15066 of 2022
[Smt. Chandrika Kantilal Patel ..vs.. Income Tax Officer, Ward-6(3), Nagpur]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's ordersappearances, Court's orders of directionsand Registrar's orders
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ms. Isha Singh, Advocate for the applicant Mr. Anand Parchure, Advocate for the respondent
CORAM: ROHIT B. DEO ROHIT B. DEO AND
: ROHIT B. DEO ROHIT B. DEO AND MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED:8-3-2023
For reasons stated, we allow the applicationseeking condonation of delay.
2.Delay of 6 days in preferring the appeal standscondoned.
3.Let the appeal be registered and listed inadmission board after two weeks.
4.In the meanwhile learned counsel for theDepartment, Mr. Parchure to verify if the appealpreferred by the father of the appellant and whichappeal, according to the tribunal involves an identicalissue, is admitted by the High Court.
5.The application is disposed of.
(Mrs. Vrushali V. Joshi, J.)
(Rohit B. Deo, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.