Case Law › High Court › Income Tax, Bi'aspur (C.g v. Karim

Income Tax, Bi'aspur (C.g v. Karim

High Court 16 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

16 Jun 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Income Tax, Bi'aspur (C.g v. Karim, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

•.<'^''-S-Wili'8t%iSi^p^S~tite:B-ji--?c?fiBit^KI BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARHATBILASPUR /2008 Tax Case (Income Tax Appeal) No. Assistant Commissioner of :Appellant Income Tax, Bi'aspur (C.G.) VERSUS Smt. Roshan Ara W/o. Shri H.A. Respondent '•^\ Ct).. • ^y"1^;•-£.'-" Karim, Prop;- M/s. Bukhari ^, Transport Company,Link Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) -ys •- ^•' INCOWIE TAX APPEAUJ/S. 260 AOF INCOME TAX ACT. 1961. XI-HC-22'S^ •<<i<<i«t|,afll'y'is, hwiuyOT^?T 'q^TWWiTflillcb_._^[Ct*&.<S'A£n.'?AQ,^2flo8te^ir'f'W'han^rqn OT^fsii^i's^iiwafro<»l<ll<1ll-tWivK 4 fe'St <[°«dl<^si^OTsn^??5(t*1 •(^flDivisiQn Bench:-Hcn'bleShrLDhirendraMishra 9>Hpn'bie Shri R.N. Chandrakar, j16/06/2009ShriS.RaieshwarRa|i,counsel for the appellant.Thematterislisted4ndefault for non filing of certifidcopy ofthe impuaned order.Learnedcounselfortfteirf1'appeilant prays for and is grant^dfour week's time to fiie the same.It is made clear that if tBiedefault is not removed within tlestioulated period, the appea! shtillstand dismissed without any furth|erreference to the Bench.Sd/-Sd/-Dhirendia MishraR.N. ChandrakarJadgeJudgePriya tvft~[

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.