Income Tax (Central)-3 v. M/S Shalimar Town Planners Pvt. Ltd
High Court
13 Mar 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Income Tax (Central)-3 v. M/S Shalimar Town Planners Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
13 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Income Tax (Central)-3 v. M/S Shalimar Town Planners Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2020) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: No reply to the present application has been filed despite notice having been accepted by the Department on 16[th] July, 2019 Consequently, the present application is allowed and appeal is dismissed on the ground of low tax effect.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 617/2019
PR. COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-3 ..... Appellant
Through Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Parth Seemwal, Jr. Standing Counsel and Mr. Mehak Sachdeva, Advocates
versus
M/S SHALIMAR TOWN PLANNERS PVT. LTD.
Through
..... Respondent Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R% 13.03.2020
CM APPL. 9669/2020
Present application has been filed by the respondent-assessee for disposal of the present case on the ground of low tax effect.
In the application, it is stated that the present appeal of the Department-appellant is covered by the low tax effect circular issued by CBDT dated 8[th] August, 2019 numbered as circular no. 17/2019, wherein monetary limits for filing of appeals by the Department to the High Court has been revised to Rs. 1 crore and the tax effect involved in the present
appeal (ITA No. 617/2019) is admittedly Rs.8,76,695/-. No reply to the present application has been filed despite notice having been accepted by the Department on 16[th] July, 2019 Consequently, the present application is allowed and appeal is dismissed on the ground of low tax effect.
MANMOHAN, J
MARCH 13, 2020 rn
SANJEEV NARULA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.