Case Law › High Court › Income Tax Ii], Ludhiana v. Shri B.k.jai...

Income Tax Ii], Ludhiana v. Shri B.k.jain, 94-D, Bhai Randhir Singh

High Court 19 May 2014 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

19 May 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Income Tax Ii], Ludhiana v. Shri B.k.jain, 94-D, Bhai Randhir Singh, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH ITA No.38 of 2011 (O&M)Date of decision: 19.5.201 The Commissioner of Income Tax III, Ludhiana .....- Appe Vs, Shri B.K.Jain, 94-D, Bhai Randhir Singh Nagar, Ludhiana ...mespondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICEK AJAY KUMAR MITTAHON’ BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH Present:Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Sachin Bhardwaj, Advocate for the respondent. Ajay Kumar Mittal,J, For orders, see ITA No.37 of 2011 (The Commissioner of Income Tax II], Ludhiana vs. Shri B.K.Jain, 94-D, Bhai Randhir Singh Nagar, Ludhiana). (Ajay Kumar Mittal)Judge May 19, 2014 >9%> (Jaspal Singh)Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.