Income Tax - International Taxation -1 v. Nuovo Pignone International Slr
High Court
06 Feb 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Income Tax - International Taxation -1 v. Nuovo Pignone International Slr
Date of order
06 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Income Tax - International Taxation -1 v. Nuovo Pignone International Slr, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~51
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 129/2019
THE COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -1 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Ruchir Bhatia, Sr.Std.Counsel
versus
NUOVO PIGNONE INTERNATIONAL SLR
..... Respondent
Through: Mr.Siddharth Joshi, Advocate
CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHATHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R% 06.02.2019
1.The issue which the Revenue seeks to adjudicate i.e. interest under Section 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is covered by the Division Bench ruling of this Court in Director of Income Tax International Taxation vs. GE Packaged Power Inc., (2018) 373 ITR 65.
2.No question of law arises. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
3.It appears that an appeal has been entertained by the Supreme Court against the order of the GE Packaged Power Inc. (supra). The parties to the present litigation i.e. the Revenue and the Assessee [Nuovo Pignone International SLR] shall be bound by the decision on the question of law, to be decided finally in that regard.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
FEBRUARY 06, 2019/„hkaur‟
PRATEEK JALAN, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.