Income Tax Officer v. Ms. Naushina Ali, Advocate.:none
High Court
19 Feb 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Income Tax Officer v. Ms. Naushina Ali, Advocate.:none
Date of order
19 Feb 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Income Tax Officer v. Ms. Naushina Ali, Advocate.:none, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Anu
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Tax Case (Income Tax Appeal) No. 9 of 2016
Income Tax Officer-1, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.
---- Appellant
Versus
Smt. Leela Choudhary, Legal Heir Sh. Sundar Lal Choudhary, R/o Old Machhali Market, Camp 2, Bhilai District Durg, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
For AppellantFor Respondent
:Ms. Naushina Ali, Advocate.:None.
Hon'ble Shri Navin Sinha, Chief JusticeHon'ble Shri P. Sam Koshy, J.
Order on Board
Per Navin Sinha, Chief Justice
19/02/2016
1.Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that the amount involved in the present case is less than Rs. 20 Lacs. In view of the circular dated 10.12.2015 of the Central Board of Direct Taxes giving retrospective effect, the appeal may be permitted to be withdrawn.
2.The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- Sd/- (Navin Sinha)CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE
(P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue