Case LawHigh Court › Income Tax Officer-2 Raigarh, District :...

Income Tax Officer-2 Raigarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh v. Shri Vinod Kumar Jain College Road Jashpur, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

High Court 10 Dec 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Income Tax Officer-2 Raigarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh v. Shri Vinod Kumar Jain College Road Jashpur, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh
Date of order
10 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Income Tax Officer-2 Raigarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh v. Shri Vinod Kumar Jain College Road Jashpur, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 3.Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
2024:CGHC:48455-DB HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURTAXC No. 81 of 2023 NAFR Income Tax Officer-2 Raigarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant Versus Shri Vinod Kumar Jain College Road Jashpur, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent For Appellant For Respondent :Mr. Amit Chaudhari, Advocate with Mr. Vijay Chawla, Advocate:Mr. Apurv Goyal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Order on Board 10.12.2024 1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that in the present case monetary limit (tax liability) is less than Rs. 2 crores, therefore, in light of circular dated 17.09.2024, he prays for withdrawal of this appeal. 2.Prayer is allowed. 3.Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/-(Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Radhakishan Agrawal) JUDGE JUDGE Saurabh
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan