Case Law › High Court › Income Tax Officer, Jagdalpur v. Respond...

Income Tax Officer, Jagdalpur v. Respondentssurendra Kumar Kataria

High Court 29 Apr 2013 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

29 Apr 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Income Tax Officer, Jagdalpur v. Respondentssurendra Kumar Kataria, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

URT [ JUDICATURE][ AT][ BILA$PUR]IN [ HIGH][ CO]No2Q%L/Qa?$ ©gwv [ g§%§%]&:C.CIncome[Tax][ Officer][ Jagdalpur']APPLICANTVsM/s[[5w”]]fwebrkumar[Ka’rama]NON-APPLICANTSurendraTxvw9QIcesw,oFITANo1 %/2ooG,FORREsTonATmNAPPLICATOINvIDEORDERavLIMITATEDAsBARREDDIsMIssEDDIVISIONByTHEHON‘BLEPAssED\“7DATED16/62009&HON'BLEMIsHRAMRDHIRENDRA(HON'BLE@ENCH1yCHANDRAKAR)MRJusTICE[R][ N]Jwi M/s[[5w”]] ,ca ,[@] HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHBILASPUR D.B.:HON’BLE MR. SUNIL KUMAR SINHA &HON’BLE MR. RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, JJ. M.C.C. NO. 207/2013 income Tax Officer, Jagdalpur. APPLICANT Versus RESPONDENTSSurendra Kumar Kataria. APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION Appearance: Mr Anand DadarlyaAdvocate forthe Applicant ORDER(29.04.201[3)] Heard. Mr. Anand Dadariya, Iearned[counsel][ for][ the][ Applicant,][ makes][ statement][ that]inadvertently instead of[ filing][ a][ review]petition,[the][ applicant][ has][ filed][ MCC][ making]prayer[for][ restoration][ of][ the][ original][ lncome][ Text][ Appeal](ITA),[therefore,]this MCCmay be permitted to be withdrawn as the[applicant][ would][ file][ a][ duly][ constituted][ review]petition. M C CNo207/2013 for restoration, therefore,[ is]disposed[of][ as][ withdrawn.] Sd/—Rangnath ChandrakarJudge Sd/-lISumlKumar SmhaJudgea{w‘

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.