Case Law › High Court › Income Tax Officer, Sunam v. M/S Guga Ra...

Income Tax Officer, Sunam v. M/S Guga Ram Jiwa Ram And Others

High Court 04 Jul 2019 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

04 Jul 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Income Tax Officer, Sunam v. M/S Guga Ram Jiwa Ram And Others, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

308IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA.AT CHANDIGARH CRA-S-225 /7-SBA-2003 (O&Date of decision: July 04, 2019 Income Tax Officer, Sunam| Versus M/s Guga Ram Jiwa Ram and others ....Appellant ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN Present:Mr. Zora Singh Kular, Advocatefor the appellant. Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Jagmohan Ghumman, DAG, Punjab, ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN, J.(Oral) On 28.8.2018, while noticing the affidavit filed by the StationHouse Officer, Police Station City Sunam, District Sangrur, it was found thatrespondent No.3 Ashok Kumar and respondent No.4-Suresh Kumar havedied and the appeal qua them stood abated, The Registry has put up a note and in which it has been reported that respondents No. 1 and 2 have since been died. In view of the same, the present appeal stands abated as none of the accused persons is alive. Disposed of as having been abated. July 04, 2019 +,-.+/ (ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN )JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned |Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.