Case LawHigh Court › Income Tax Officer (Tds v. Respondentchh...

Income Tax Officer (Tds v. Respondentchhattisgarhstateelectricityboard

High Court 04 Dec 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Income Tax Officer (Tds v. Respondentchhattisgarhstateelectricityboard
Date of order
04 Dec 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Income Tax Officer (Tds v. Respondentchhattisgarhstateelectricityboard, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: This appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn with liberty to file separate appeals for eachassessment year.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
BEFORE THE HON*BLB HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR D.B.: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre 85Hon'ble Mr. Justice G. Minhajuddin Tax Case No. 71 of 2012 APPELLANT Income Tax Officer (TDS) Versus RESPONDENTChhattisgarhStateElectricityBoard APPEAL UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOMETAXACT. 1961 Shri Anand Dadaria, Counsel for the appellant.None for the respondent. QRALORDER(04.12.2012) Thefollowingorder of the Court waspassedbyAbhay Manohar Sapre, J. (1)This appeal is filed by the appellant/revenue underSection 260-A of the Income Tax Act,1961 against theorderdated30.11.2011passedbytheIncomeTaxAppellate Tribunal, Mumbai H Bench, Mumbai in I.T.A. No.20to23/BLPR/2010. (2)Learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions,submits that the appellant may be permitted to withdrawthis appeal with liberty to file separate appeals for eachassessment year. He further prays that the Registry maybe directed to return the certified copy of the impugnedorders to him. (3)The prayer is accepted. This appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn with liberty to file separate appeals for eachassessment year. In other words, withdrawal of this appeal Thakur would not come in the way of the appellant to file separateappeals, as prayed. (4)The Registry is directed to return the certified copy oftheimpugnedorderstothelearnedcounselfortheappellant, retaining photo copy of the same for record. (5)No cost. Sd/-G. MinhaiuddinJudge Sd/-Abhay Manohar SapreJudge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan