In Income Tax Officer (Tps), Sambalpur And Others v. Mr. P. R. Patro, Advocate, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.6611 of 2024
Deokaran Prasad Jaiswal
Income Tax Officer (TPS), Sambalpur and Others
…..
Vs. …..
Petitioner
Mr. P. R. Patro, Advocate
Opposite parties
CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE G.SATAPATHY
Order No.
01.
ORDER21.03.2024
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner by filing a memo contended that the petitioner does not want to press this writ petition and wants to withdraw the same. The memo be kept on record.
3. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
(G.SATAPATHY)
JUDGE
S.Sasmal
Signature Not Verified
Digitally SignedSigned by: SUBHASMITA SASMALDesignation: Jr. StenographerReason: AuthenticationLocation: High Court of OrissaDate: 22-Mar-2024 18:04:36
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.