Income Tax Officer v. Shekher Dhawanij
High Court
10 Dec 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Income Tax Officer v. Shekher Dhawanij
Date of order
10 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Income Tax Officer v. Shekher Dhawanij, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH.
1144260|
CRM-M-34430-2018 (O&M)Date of Decision: 10.12.2018
M/s Skymark Motor Pvt. Ltd. And others
— Petitioners
Income Tax Officer
Versus
.... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEKHER DHAWAN
Present:Mr.Mandeep K. Dhot, Advocate forMr.J.S.Dadwal, Advocatefor the applicant/petitioners.
Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Sr. Standing Counselfor the respondent.
++++
Shekher DhawaniJ.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent contended thatthe matter has since been compounded under Section 279(2) of the IncomeTax Act, 1961 and compounding amount is to be deposited by the petitionerwithin a period of one week.
In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with adirection to the learned trial Judge to pass an appropriate order on the basisof compromise having been effected between the parties while taking intoconsideration to the effect whether the amount has been deposited or not?
December 10, 2018
anju
(SHEKHER DHAWAN)%(#96
Whether speaking/ reasoned;Yes/ No
Whether Reportable!Yes/ No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue