Case LawHigh Court › Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Kishangarh,...

Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Kishangarh, Ajmer v. Dharmendra Gupta (Huf)

High Court 24 Feb 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Kishangarh, Ajmer v. Dharmendra Gupta (Huf)
Date of order
24 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Kishangarh, Ajmer v. Dharmendra Gupta (Huf), the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 402/2022 Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Kishangarh, Ajmer. ----Appellant Versus Dharmendra Gupta (Huf), Through Its Karta Shri DharmendraGupta S/o Sh. Babu Lal Gupta, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Opp,Laxmi Narayan Mandir, Ajmer Road, Madanganj, Kishangarh,Ajmer - 305801 (Raj.) ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Ms. Parinitoo Jain through VCFor Respondent(s): HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AKIL KURESHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 24/02/2022 Defects are waived. The appeal is filed by the revenue to challenge the judgmentof the learned Single Judge dated 02.12.2021 quashing a notice ofreopening of assessment issued by the assessing officer after01.04.2021 but for a period prior to the said date. Under identicalcircumstances in group of petitions lead case being SudeshTaneja Vs. Income Tax Officer and Anr. (D.B. Civil WritPetition No. 969/2022) decided on 27.01.2022, petitions ofthe assessees were allowed and appeals of the revenue weredismissed. Without recording separate reasons therefore this appeal isalso dismissed. Pending applications stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J(AKIL KURESHI),CJ Kamlesh Kumar/S-102
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan