Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Rourkela & Another v. Mr. A. Agarwal, Advocate
High Court
12 Apr 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Rourkela & Another v. Mr. A. Agarwal, Advocate
Date of order
12 Apr 2024
Assessment year(s)
2016-2017
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Rourkela & Another v. Mr. A. Agarwal, Advocate, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 21296 of 2023
Manish Mehta
Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Rourkela & Another
…..
Vs. …..
Petitioner
Mr. A. Agarwal, Advocate
Opposite Parties
Mr. S.C. Mohanty, Sr. Standing Counsel for IT Department
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
Order No.
05.
ORDER
12.04.2024
This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.
2. The short ground on which the Petitioner prays for quashing of the notice dated 30.03.2023 issued by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Rourkela under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2016-2017, issued to his father is that by the time the said notice was issued, he had already expired. He has placed on record the certificate of the death, issued by the Department of Health Services Government of Haryana which shows the date of death to be 22.08.2020.
3. The fact that the notice was issued and an order was passed against a person who had already expired by the time the notice was issued is unable to be disputed by Mr. S.C. Mohanty, learned Sr. Standing Counsel for IT Department. Consequently, the Court has no hesitation to hold that the entire proceedings stand vitiated. Consequently, the impugned notice dated 30.03.2023 U/s. 148 of the Income Tax Act, passed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-1,
Rourkela and all actions and orders consequent thereto are hereby quashed.
4. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
(G. SATAPATHY)
JUDGE
S.Sasmal
.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally SignedSigned by: SUBHASMITA SASMALDesignation: Jr. StenographerReason: AuthenticationLocation: High Court of Orissa
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.