Case Law › High Court › Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Bilaspur...

Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Bilaspur (C.g v. Jila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur (C.g

High Court 24 Apr 2017 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

24 Apr 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Bilaspur (C.g v. Jila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur (C.g, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR TAX CASE NO. 37 OF 2017 Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Appellant Versus Jila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent For Appellant: Ms. Naushina Ali, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Chief JusticeHon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board Per Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, C.J. 24/04/2017 1.In view of the Circular No. 21/2015, dated 10.12.2015, issued by theGovernment of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, CentralBoard Direct Taxes, New Delhi, it is submitted by the learned Counsel forthe Appellant that this matter may be dismissed in view of the monetarylimit. 2.Hence it is dismissed. Sd/- Sd/- (Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan) (P. Sam Koshy) (P. Sam Koshy) Judge /sharad/ Chief Justice

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.