Case Law › High Court › Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1) Raipur, (C...

Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1) Raipur, (Chhattisgarh v. Tikamchand Pritwani, C

High Court 03 Feb 2016 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

03 Feb 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1) Raipur, (Chhattisgarh v. Tikamchand Pritwani, C, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 2.The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn for the aforesaid reason.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Amit NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Tax Case No. 49 of 2015 Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1) Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Appellant Versus Tikamchand Pritwani, C-63, Samta Colony, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondent For AppellantFor Respondent :Ms. Naushina Ali, Advocate.:None. Hon'ble Shri Navin Sinha, Chief JusticeHon'ble Shri P. Sam Koshy, J. Order on Board Per Navin Sinha, Chief Justice 03/02/2016 1. Learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to withdraw the appeal on the submission that the amount involved is less than that stipulated in the new circular dated 10.12.2015 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, restricting the appeals to the value of Rs. 20 Lacs and above giving it retrospective effect. 2.The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn for the aforesaid reason. Sd/- (Navin Sinha)CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.