Case Law › High Court › Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2) & Ors v. D...

Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2) & Ors v. Dr.madhusudan V. Gosavi (Huf

High Court 23 Sep 2004 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newas

Parties

Date of order

23 Sep 2004

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2) & Ors v. Dr.madhusudan V. Gosavi (Huf, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1726 OF 2002IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2741 OF 1994 1. Income Tax Officer,Ward 1(2) & Ors.vs. Dr.Madhusudan V. Gosavi (HUF) Ms.S.V.Bharucha i/b. Mr.H.D.Rathod for the applicants. CORAM: R. M. LODHA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 23rd September 2004 P.C. ApplicantsOpponent We are informed by the Court Sheristedar that asper the sitting list commencing from 6th September 2004 as final hearing of the writ petition arising out of income-tax is not assigned to any bench. 2. Though the writ petition is old, in view of the aforesaid reason, the hearing of the writ petition cannot be fixed. 3. Civil application stands disposed of. (R.M.LODHA, J.)(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.