Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2) & Ors v. Ward 1(2) & Ors. Applicants Vs. Dr.madhusudhan V. Gosavi(Indl.) Opponent
High Court
23 Sep 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2) & Ors v. Ward 1(2) & Ors. Applicants Vs. Dr.madhusudhan V. Gosavi(Indl.) Opponent
Date of order
23 Sep 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2) & Ors v. Ward 1(2) & Ors. Applicants Vs. Dr.madhusudhan V. Gosavi(Indl.) Opponent, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1736 OF 2002IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 2738 OF 1994
1. Income Tax Officer,Ward 1(2) & Ors.vs.
Ward 1(2) & Ors.Applicantsvs.Dr.Madhusudhan V. Gosavi(Indl.)Opponent
Ms.S.V.Bharucha i/b. Mr.H.D.Rathod for the applicants.
CORAM: R. M. LODHA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATED: 23rd September 2004P.C.We are informed by the Court Sheristedar that asper the sitting list commencing from 6th September 2004final hearing of the writ petition arising out ofincome-tax is not assigned to any bench.2. Though the writ petition is old, in view of theaforesaid reason, the hearing of the writ petitioncannot be fixed.3. Civil application stands disposed of.(R.M.LODHA, J.)(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue