Income Tax Officer, Ward 2 (2), Patna v. M/S Bihar State Financial Corporation, Fraser Road, Patna
High Court
18 Sep 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Income Tax Officer, Ward 2 (2), Patna v. M/S Bihar State Financial Corporation, Fraser Road, Patna
Date of order
18 Sep 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Income Tax Officer, Ward 2 (2), Patna v. M/S Bihar State Financial Corporation, Fraser Road, Patna, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
418-09-2023
Bibhash/SaurabhU
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.359 of 2017
======================================================
Income Tax Officer, Ward 2 (2), Patna
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
M/s Bihar State Financial Corporation, Fraser Road, Patna
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================Appearance :For the Appellant/s: Ms. Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi, Advocate For the Respondent/s: Mr. Parijat Saurav, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHYORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
1. The Government of India, Ministry of Finance
brought out a Circular dated 08.08.2019, wherein the litigationpolicy insofar as not filing an appeal before the High Courtwhere the monetary stake is less than one crore rupees. Thisapplies squarely in the above case.
2. The monetary limit of the litigation policy havingnot been exceeded, we are of the opinion that the appeal has tobe closed, but however, leaving the question of law open.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
( Partha Sarthy, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.