Case LawHigh Court › Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Biharsharif,...

Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Biharsharif, Nalanda v. Shailendra Kr

High Court 28 Oct 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Biharsharif, Nalanda v. Shailendra Kr
Date of order
28 Oct 2013
Assessment year(s)
2001-02
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Biharsharif, Nalanda v. Shailendra Kr, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Appeal is dismissed in limine.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.214 of 2007 ====================================================== 1.Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Patna. 2.Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Biharsharif, Nalanda. .... .... Assessing Officer-Appellant Versus Shailendra Kr. Prop. M/s Neha Petroleum, Gandhi Tola, Rajgir, Nalanda. .... .... Assessee-Respondent ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellants : Mr. Harshwardhan Prasad, Advocate Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Ajay Rastogi, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 6. 28-10-2013 This Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is preferred by the Revenue against the judgment and order dated 6[th] February 2007 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna in I.T. Appeal No.368/Pat/2005. The matter relates to the assessment year 2001-02 and the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax dated 10[th]February 2005 made in exercise of power conferred by Section 263 of the Act. The Tribunal below has held that neither the Commissioner of Income Tax has recorded error in the order of the Assessing Officer nor it has been found to be prejudicial to the revenue. In absence of the aforesaid finding, the Commissioner of Income Tax has no authority to interfere with the order of the Assessing Officer. Therefore, this Appeal. The Appeal does not involve the question of law much less a substantial question of law. Appeal is dismissed in limine. (R.M. Doshit, CJ) Pawan/Pravin (Vikash Jain, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan