Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(2), Patna v. M/S Replica Builders & Furnishers (P) Ltd
High Court
20 Jan 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(2), Patna v. M/S Replica Builders & Furnishers (P) Ltd
Date of order
20 Jan 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(2), Patna v. M/S Replica Builders & Furnishers (P) Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the aforesaid stand on behalf of the appellants, this appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
MA No.452 of 2006
1.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (Central), Patna,
2.Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(2), Patna.
….Assessing Officer/Appellant.
Versus
M/S REPLICA BUILDERS & FURNISHERS (P) Ltd.
Braj Kunj Apartment, West Boring Canal Road, Patna
……Assessee/Respondent.
-----------
4 20.01.2011
Learned counsel for the Income Tax Department,
the appellants, fairly submits that the tax effect in this appeal is less than Rs.4 Lacs and hence he is under obligation not to press this appeal in view of the policy decision of the Government of India dated 24[th] of October, 2005 issued in exercise of powers under Section 268(A) of the Income Tax Act. As per the said circular, in order to maintain appeal under Section 260(A), the effect of the tax should be Rs.4 Lacs at the minimum.
In view of the aforesaid stand on behalf of the appellants, this appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
(Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)
Sanjay-II
(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.