Case LawHigh Court › Income Tax Officer, Ward-3, Rourkela & O...

Income Tax Officer, Ward-3, Rourkela & Others v. Mr. A. Agarwal, Advocate

High Court 12 Apr 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Income Tax Officer, Ward-3, Rourkela & Others v. Mr. A. Agarwal, Advocate
Date of order
12 Apr 2024
Assessment year(s)
2013-2014
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Income Tax Officer, Ward-3, Rourkela & Others v. Mr. A. Agarwal, Advocate, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 21662 of 2023 Sabitri Devi @ Agrawal Income Tax Officer, Ward-3, Rourkela & Others ….. Vs. ….. Petitioner Mr. A. Agarwal, Advocate Opposite Parties Mr. S.C. Mohanty, Sr. Standing Counsel for IT Department CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. 01. ORDER 12.04.2024 This matter is taken up by hybrid mode. 2. The short ground on which the Petitioner prays for quashing of the notice dated 30.07.2022 issued by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-3, Rourkela under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2013-2014, issued to her late husband is that by the time the said notice was issued, he had already expired. She has placed on record the certificate of the death, issued by the Rourkela Municipal Corporation which shows the date of death to be 19.09.2015. 3. The fact that the notice was issued and an order was passed against a person who had already expired by the time the notice was issued is unable to be disputed by Mr. S.C. Mohanty, learned Sr. Standing Counsel for IT Department. Consequently, the Court has no hesitation to hold that the entire proceedings stand vitiated. Consequently, the impugned notice dated 30.07.2022 U/s. 148 of the Income Tax Act, passed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-3, Rourkela and all actions and orders consequent thereto are hereby quashed. 4. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE (G. SATAPATHY) JUDGE S.Sasmal . Signature Not Verified Digitally SignedSigned by: SUBHASMITA SASMALDesignation: Jr. StenographerReason: AuthenticationLocation: High Court of Orissa
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan