In Income Tax Reference v. Shri S. G. Shetty, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Issue: Even todaylearned counsel for the applicant is not in a position to make astatement as to whether service has been effected or any steps inthat behalf were taken, inspite of the fact that the issue involved inthis case is covered by the judgment of this court, in the case of Commissioner of Income T...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICGTION
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 68 of 1994 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Applicant.
vs.
Shri S. G. Shetty
..... Respondent
Mr. Ashok Kotangale, Sr. Counsel with
Mr. D.A. Dubey i/b. S. Bhattacharya for Applicant.
CORAM: V. C. DAGAAND A. S. AGUIAR JJ.
Date: 26[h] July, 2005.
P. C. :
1. The above matter, was on our board on 18[th] July 2005 when oneweek's time was granted as a last chance at the request of thelearned counsel for the applicant to effect service on theRespondent. Till today no material is placed before us to show thatthe service has been effected on the Respondent. Even todaylearned counsel for the applicant is not in a position to make astatement as to whether service has been effected or any steps inthat behalf were taken, inspite of the fact that the issue involved inthis case is covered by the judgment of this court, in the case of
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Gopal Krishna Suri reported in248 ITR 819 (Bom.). We cannot answer the issue and hold in favourof the Revenue. Such a decision would be clearly in breach ofprinciples of natural justice. In this view of the matter we would bejustified in returning the reference without answering the questionreferred to our opinion. Even otherwise the tax effect is negligibleand this matter is squarely covered by the decision in the case ofCommissioner of Income-tax v/s. Camco Colour Co., reported inITR Vol. 254 (2002), page 565. In this view of the matter we have nooption but to return the reference unanswered. Reference standsdisposed of with no order as to costs.
(V. C. DAGA J. )
-x-
(A. S. AGUIAR J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.