Case LawHigh Court › Income Tax Reference v. Shri K. S. Gandh...

Income Tax Reference v. Shri K. S. Gandhi

High Court 26 Jul 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Income Tax Reference v. Shri K. S. Gandhi
Date of order
26 Jul 2005
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Income Tax Reference v. Shri K. S. Gandhi, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.

Issue: Even today learnedcounsel for the applicant is not in a position to make a statement asto whether service has been effected or any steps in that behalf weretaken, inspite of the fact that the issue involved in this case iscovered by the judgment of this court, in the case of Commissioner of Income T...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICGTION INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 82 of 1994 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Applicant. vs. Shri K. S. Gandhi ..... Respondent Mr. Ashok Kotangale, Sr. Counsel with Mr. D.A. Dubey i/b. S. Bhattacharya for Applicant. CORAM: V. C. DAGAAND A. S. AGUIAR JJ. Date: 26[h] July, 2005. P. C. : 1. The above matter, was on our board on 18[th] July 2005 when oneweek's time was granted as a last chance at the request of thelearned counsel for the applicant to effect service on theRespondent. Till today no material is placed before us to show thatservice has been effected on the Respondent. Even today learnedcounsel for the applicant is not in a position to make a statement asto whether service has been effected or any steps in that behalf weretaken, inspite of the fact that the issue involved in this case iscovered by the judgment of this court, in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Gopal Krishna Suri reported in 248 ITR 819(Bom.). We cannot answer the issue and hold in favour of theRevenue. Such a decision would be clearly in breach of principles ofnatural justice. In this view of the matter we would be justified inreturning the reference without answering the question referred toour opinion. Even otherwise the tax effect is negligible and thismatter is squarely covered by the decision in the case ofCommissioner of Income-tax v/s. Camco Colour Co., reported inITR Vol. 254 (2002), page 565. In this view of the matter we have nooption but to return the reference unanswered. Reference standsdisposed of with no order as to costs. (V. C. DAGA J. ) -x- (A. S. AGUIAR J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan