Income Tax Settlement Commissionand Ors v. Amit B. Borkar, Jj
High Court
17 Nov 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Income Tax Settlement Commissionand Ors v. Amit B. Borkar, Jj
Date of order
17 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
2015-16, 2018-19
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Income Tax Settlement Commissionand Ors v. Amit B. Borkar, Jj, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitallysigned byPURTIPURTIPRASADPRASADPARABPARABDate:2021.11.2211:00:28
+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2406 OF 2021
Mohammad Moinuddin Khan
V/s.
Income Tax Settlement Commissionand Ors.
….Petitioner
…Respondents
----
Mr. Ajay Singh i/b Mr. Sameer Dalal for Petitioner.Mr. Sham V. Walve a/w Mr. Pritish Chatterjee for Respondents.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &
AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.
DATED : 17[th] NOVEMBER 2021
P.C. :
1.Mr. Ajay Singh tenders a copy of Order dated 28/09/2021
issued by CBDT bearing F. No.299/22/2021-Dir (Inv. III)/174 in which
paragraph 3 reads as under :-
“3.In view of the above, the Board in exercise of its powerunder clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 119 of the Income-taxAct, 1961 (the Act), in order to avoid genuine hardship to assesseesauthorizes the Commissioner of Income-tax, posted as Secretary to theSettlement Commission prior to 01.02.2021, to admit an applicationfor settlement on behalf of the Interim Board filed after 31.01.2021,which is the date mentioned in sub-section (5) of section 245C of theAct for filing such application, and before 30.09.2021 and treat suchapplications as valid and process them as “pending applications” asdefined in clause (eb) of section 245A of the act.”
2.
It is stated in the petition that Petitioner has filed Settlement
Application for A.Y. 2015-16 to A.Y. 2018-19 on 05/03/2021. Since that is
before the extended date of 30/09/2021 as mentioned in the order,Mr.Walve states that Petitioner’s application will also be considered subject
to other conditions being fulfilled in accordance with law.
3.Petition accordingly stands disposed.
(AMIT B. BORKAR, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.