Case LawHigh Court › Income Tax v. Makwana Brothers & Co. (In...

Income Tax v. Makwana Brothers & Co. (Income Tax Appeal

High Court 18 Apr 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Income Tax v. Makwana Brothers & Co. (Income Tax Appeal
Date of order
18 Apr 2018
Assessment year(s)
2009-10
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Income Tax v. Makwana Brothers & Co. (Income Tax Appeal, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: 5.The appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 21 OF 2016 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-4 .. Appellant v/s. M/s. System Enterprises .. Respondent Mr. Tejveer Singh for the appellant Mr. Ruturaj Gurjar i/b Mihir Naniwadekar for the respondent for the CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J. P.C. DATED : 18[th ]APRIL, 2018. 1.This Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) challenges the order dated 28[th] August, 2014 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal). The impugned order is in respect of Assessment Year 2009-10. 2.The Revenue urges only the following question of law for our consideration. (i)Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal has failed in allowing the assessee's claim of deduction u/s 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 without appreciating the fact that the assessee has not been able to obtain the requisite completion certificate from local authority within the prescribed time limit, and not fulfilled the conditions laid down in para (i) of sub-clause(a) of section 80IB(10) of the Income tax Act, 1961 for claiming deduction u/s 80IB(10) of the Act”. 3.It is an agreed position between the parties that the issue raised herein stands concluded against the Revenue and in favour of the respondent assessee by the decision of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Makwana Brothers & Co. (Income Tax Appeal No.444 of 2015), decided on 25[th] September, 2017. 4.In the above view, the question as proposed does not give rise to any substantial question of law. Thus, not entertained. 5.The appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan