In Inderjeet Mehta v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jalandhar, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: (Oral): The writ petition is allowed in terms of the order of even date passed in CWP No.11 of 1990 (M/s Kahan Chand v.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.12904 of 1990Date of decision: August 01, 2013.
Inderjeet Mehta
... Petitioner
v.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON
Present:None for the petitioners.
Shri G.S. Hooda, Advocate and Shri Vivek Sethi, Advocate for the respondents.
Rajive Bhalla, J. (Oral):
The writ petition is allowed in terms of the order of even date
passed in CWP No.11 of 1990 (M/s Kahan Chand v. Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Amritsar).
[ Rajive Bhalla ] Judge
August 01, 2013. kadyan
[Dr. Bharat Bhushan Parsoon] Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.