Indian Bank,Rep. By The Executive Director,Mr.ashutosh Choudhury v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
02 Sep 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· hc_cis_mas
Parties
Indian Bank,Rep. By The Executive Director,Mr.ashutosh Choudhury v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
02 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
β
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Indian Bank,Rep. By The Executive Director,Mr.ashutosh Choudhury v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2025) decided the matter under Section 9 of the Income-tax Act.
Decision: With the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below β read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order β as passed by the High Court
W.P.No.32458 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.09.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
W.P.No. 32458 of 2025and
W.M.P.Nos. 36379 and 36383 of 2025
Indian Bank,Rep. By the Executive Director,Mr.Ashutosh Choudhury,No.254-260, Avvai Shanmugam Salai,Royapettah, Chennai β 600 014.
..Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
Corporate Circle 1(1), Chennai β 600 034.
2.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
Circle 6(1), Kolkata Aayakar Bhawan,
P-7, Chowringhee Square,
Kolkata -700 069.
..Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
praying to issue Writ of Certiorari, calling for records relating to the impugned
order passed in ITA/1675/CHNY/2024 dated 04.09.2024, passed by the Income
Tax Appellate Tribunal, βBβ Bench, Chennai, to quash same.
1/6
W.P.No.32458 of 2025
For Petitioner : Mr.Shiva Kumar.G
For Respondent : Mr.B.Ramana Kumar
Senior Standing Counsel assisted by Mr.Avinash, Junior Standing Counsel for R1
ORDER
This writ petition is filed by the petitioner / Indian Bank, challenging the
order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA/1675/CHNY/2024 dated 04.09.2024, on the premise that the impugned order has been passed without issuing notice to the Indian Bank.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in exercise of
powers conferred under Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 (5 of 1970), the Central Government after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India, formulated a scheme which provided for amalgamation of Allahabad Bank into Indian Bank and the said scheme came into force on 1st day of April, 2020. The relevant portion of the said scheme is extracted hereunder:-
βIn exercise of the powers conferred by Section 9 of the
2/6
W.P.No.32458 of 2025
Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 (5 of 1970), the Central Government after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India hereby makes the following Scheme, namely:-1. Short title and commencement.-
(1) This Scheme may be called the Amalgamation of Allahabad Bank into Indian Bank Scheme, 2020. Bank into Indian Bank Scheme, 2020.
(2) It shall come into force on the 1st day of April, 2020.β
3. It is the case of the petitioner / Indian Bank that pursuant to the above order of amalgamation, Allahabad Bank no longer exist i.e., from 01.04.2020. Any proceeding will have to be addressed to the transferee Bank namely, Indian Bank / petitioner. However, the Tribunal, on 04.09.2024, passed the impugned order in the name of Allahabad Bank, which is not in existence, on the date when the impugned order was passed. He would also submit that no notice was issued to Indian Bank before passing of impugned order thus, impugned proceedings of the Tribunal suffers from irregularity, which would go to the root of the matter vitiating the entire proceedings.
4. At the outset, Mr.B.Ramana Kumar, learned Senior Standing Counsel would submit that no notices were in fact issued to the Indian Bank.
3/6
W.P.No.32458 of 2025
5. Once there is an order of amalgamation, any proceedings on the amalgamated entity Bank is non-est and void and the same is liable to be set aside.
In view thereof, the impugned order dated 04.09.2024 is set aside. The Tribunal is
directed to issue notice to the Indian Bank and thereafter, proceed to decide the appeals in accordance with law, after affording reasonable opportunity to the transferee Bank namely, Indian Bank.
6. With the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
02.09.2025
Speaking (or) Non Speaking OrderNeutral Citation: Yes/Nokkn
To
1.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
4/6
Corporate Circle 1(1), Chennai β 600 034.
3/6
W.P.No.32458 of 2025
5. Once there is an order of amalgamation, any proceedings on the amalgamated entity Bank is non-est and void and the same is liable to be set aside.
In view thereof, the impugned order dated 04.09.2024 is set aside. The Tribunal is
directed to issue notice to the Indian Bank and thereafter, proceed to decide the appeals in accordance with law, after affording reasonable opportunity to the transferee Bank namely, Indian Bank.
6. With the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
02.09.2025
Speaking (or) Non Speaking OrderNeutral Citation: Yes/Nokkn
To
1.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
4/6
Corporate Circle 1(1), Chennai β 600 034.
2.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 6(1), Kolkata Aayakar Bhawan, Circle 6(1), Kolkata Aayakar Bhawan,
P-7, Chowringhee Square,
Kolkata -700 069.
3.The Executive Director, Indian Bank,
Mr.Ashutosh Choudhury,
No.254-260, Avvai Shanmugam Salai,
Royapettah, Chennai β 600 014.
5/6
W.P.No.32458 of 2025
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
KKN
6/6
W.P.No.32458 of 2025
W.P.No.32458 of 2025
02.09.2025
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CAβclient relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.