Indian Clothing League Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer & Anr

$~75 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P. (C) 9019/2019 INDIAN CLOTHING LEAGUE PRIVATE LIMITED..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Prakash Kumar with Mr.Rupinder K.Aggarwal, Advocates. versus INCOME TAX OFFICER & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Ajit Sharma, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms.Adiba Mujahid and Ms.Priya Sarkar, Advocates. CORAM:JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH O R D E R% 21.08.2019 CM APPL. 37256/2019 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 9019/2019 and CM APPL. 37255/2019 (stay) 2. The point urged in the present petition [which the Petitioner states that it learnt only pursuant to an application before the Assessing Officer (‘AO’)] is that no notice was issued to the Petitioner under Section 143(2) Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) before passing the impugned assessment order dated 30[th] December 2018 and therefore, the said order is without jurisdiction. 3. Admittedly, the Petitioner has already filed an appeal before the W.P.(C) 9019/2019 Page 1 of 2 Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT (A)] against the aforementioned assessment order. The appeal is stated to be pending. Accordingly, the Court permits the Petitioner to raise the above plea in the pending appeal before the CIT (A) which will then be dealt with by the CIT(A) on merits in accordance with law by passing a reasoned order. 4. Considering that the appeal before the CIT (A) is pending for some time now the Court requests the CIT(A) to dispose of the said appeal not later than three months from the date of receipt of the present order. Barring the above direction the Court is not inclined to entertain the other prayers in the present petition and it is disposed of as such. S. MURALIDHAR, J. AUGUST 21, 2019 tr TALWANT SINGH, J. W.P.(C) 9019/2019 Page 2 of 2