Case LawHigh Court › Indian National Ship Owners’association...

Indian National Ship Owners’association v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors

High Court 20 Apr 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Indian National Ship Owners’association v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors
Date of order
20 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Indian National Ship Owners’association v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-) MGN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.40 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.400 OF 2007 Indian National Ship Owners’Association..Petitioners Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors...Respondents Mr. J.D. Mistry i/b. Bose & Mitra & Co., for the Petitioners. Mr. Parag Vyas for respondents. CORAM: F.I. J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED: 20th April, 2009 P.C.: P.C.: . Heard parties. The Chamber Summons has been taken out pursuant to the order passed by the Supreme Court, which granted liberty to the parties to give details of the members of the Association who are likely to be affected by the result of the pending petition. By this Chamber Summons the petitioners have given a list of the parties to be added as parties. Considering the order of the Supreme Court Chamber Summons made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (i) and (ii). Amendment to be carried out within four weeks from today. Petition fixed for final hearing on 22nd June, 2009 at 3.00 p.m. Parties to complete their pleadings on or before that date. (-2-) (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan