Indian Rayon Andindustries Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of
High Court
11 Mar 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Indian Rayon Andindustries Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of
Date of order
11 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Indian Rayon Andindustries Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.179 OF 2005
Indian Rayon andIndustries Ltd..Appellant
Vs.
Assistant Commissioner of
Income Tax ..Respondent
Mr. Sanjiv M.Shah i/b. Dave & Girish & Co., for the
Appellant.
Mr. Vimal Gupta with Mr. P.S. Sahadevan, for the
Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE,JJ.DATED: 11TH MARCH,2008
R.S.MOHITE,JJ.
DATED: 11TH MARCH,2008
P.C.:
P.C.:
. Except for question Nos. 1 and 2 learned
Counsel for the Appellant submits that he is not
pressing the other questions. In so far as
questions 1 and 2 are concerned they are covered in
favour of the Revenue by the judgment of the Supreme
Court reported in 278 ITR 546 (S.C.). In the light
of the above appeal dismissed.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue