Case LawHigh Court › Indian Syntans Investments Pvt. Ltd v. T...

Indian Syntans Investments Pvt. Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,Company Circle Ii (3)

High Court 09 Jan 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Indian Syntans Investments Pvt. Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,Company Circle Ii (3)
Date of order
09 Jan 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Indian Syntans Investments Pvt. Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,Company Circle Ii (3), the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Decision: We confirm the direction to the respondent to consider the objections on the assumption of jurisdiction after granting the Assessee an opportunity of personal hearing.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED09.01.2017 CORAM The Hon'ble Mr.Justice HULUVADI G.RAMESHAND The Hon'ble Dr. Justice ANITA SUMANTH W.A. No.2646 of 2010 Indian Syntans Investments Pvt. Ltd.,represented by its DirectorN.Narayanan .. Appellant v. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Company Circle II (3),121, Nungambakkam High Road,Chennai-600 034... Respondent Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the judgment dated 30.11.2010 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. No.27139/2010. For appellant:Mr.P.S.Raman,Senior Counsel forMr.R.Sivaraman For respondent:Mr.P.Rajkumar Jhabakh JUDGMENT (Judgment of this Court was delivered by ANITA SUMANTH, J.) The present Writ Appeal is filed challenging an order dated 30.11.2010 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. No.27139 of 2010. HULUVADI G.RAMESH J.ANDDr.ANITA SUMANTH,J. vga 2.This Writ Appeal is disposed of by modifying the order dated 30.11.2010 passed by the learned Single Judge and setting aside only impugned order dated 30.03.2010. We confirm the direction to the respondent to consider the objections on the assumption of jurisdiction after granting the Assessee an opportunity of personal hearing. Accordingly, the respondent is directed to pass a speaking order on the aspect of jurisdiction under Section 147 of the Act, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Index:Yes/Novga (H.G.R.J.) (A.S.M.J.) 09.01.2017 To The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Circle II (3),121, Nungambakkam High Road,Chennai-600 034. W.A. No.2646 of 2010
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan