Case LawHigh Court › Indico Vanijya Private Limited v. Commis...

Indico Vanijya Private Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) And Ors

High Court 13 Aug 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Indico Vanijya Private Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) And Ors
Date of order
13 Aug 2024
Assessment year(s)
2014-15
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Indico Vanijya Private Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) And Ors, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: With the above observation, the present writ petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE WPO/721/2024 INDICO VANIJYA PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) AND ORS. BEFORE : THE HON’BLE JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY Date: 13[th] August, 2024 Appearance :Mr. Siddharth Das, Adv. Ms. Swapna Das, Adv. …for the petitioner Mr. Smarajit Roychowdhury, Adv. Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv. Ms. Doyel Dey, Adv. ….for respondents The Court :- Present writ petition has been filed, inter alia, calling upon the respondent no.1 to dispose of the petitioner’s appeal for the assessment year 2014-15 which has been filed on 22[nd] October, 2021 and is pending since then. Challenging, inter alia, an assessment order passed under Section 147 read with 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 29[th] September, 2021, an appeal had been filed by the petitioner under Section 246 of the said Act. Mr. Das, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner by drawing attention of this Court to the acknowledgement issued by the Income Tax Department on 22[nd] October, 2021 would submit that the appeal from the aforesaid assessment order is pending adjudication before the Appellate Authority. The said appeal is yet to be disposed of. He prays for expeditious disposal of the appeal. Mr. Roychowdhury, learned Advocate appearing for the respondents would confirm the fact that the appeal is still pending. Having regard to the aforesaid and considering the materials on record, I am of the view that the respondent no.1 should take steps to expeditiously dispose of the appeal within a period of twelve weeks from the date of communication of this order without granting any unnecessary adjournment. With the above observation, the present writ petition is disposed of. There will be no order as to costs. (RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY, J.) akg/
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan