Indivest Pte Ltd. Singapore v. Assistant Director Of Income-Tax
High Court
01 Dec 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Indivest Pte Ltd. Singapore v. Assistant Director Of Income-Tax
Date of order
01 Dec 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Indivest Pte Ltd. Singapore v. Assistant Director Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Decision: The Petition is accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGNAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2154 OF 2011
Indivest Pte Ltd. Singapore.
.. Petitioner.
versus
Assistant Director of Income-tax
(International Taxation)-3(1)
Mumbai & Anr.
.....
.. Respondents.
Mr. Porus Kaka, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Manish Kanth and Mr. Atul
K. Jasani for the Petitioner.
Mr. Sureshkumar for the Respondents.
......
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD &
A. A. SAYED, JJ.
01 DECEMBER 2011.
P.C. :
In response to a notice issued to the Petitioner under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on 16 March 2011 and the reasons disclosed under a letter dated 6 April 2011, the Petitioner submitted objections for reopening of the assessment on 14 June 2011. In terms of the decisiion of the Supreme Court in GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd., vs. Income Tax Officer, [1] we direct the Assessing Officer to dispose of the objections by a reasoned order within a period of four weeks from today. Until then, no steps shall be taken in pursuance of the notice dated 16 March 2011 and in the event that an adverse order is passed, for a further period of four weeks thereafter. Since the Court is informed that limitation for completing the assessment is to expire on 31 December 2011 and in order to protect the Revenue against the bar of limitation, we direct by way of abundant caution that the assessment proceedings shall remain stayed until a final decision is taken by the Assessing Officer and four weeks
thereafter. The Petition is accordingly disposed of.
(Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
(A. A. Sayed, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.