Case LawHigh Court › Indukumar C Patel v. Commissioner Of Inc...

Indukumar C Patel v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance

High Court 15 Jun 1998 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Indukumar C Patel v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance
Date of order
15 Jun 1998
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Indukumar C Patel v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance, the High Court (1998) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- INDUKUMAR C PATEL Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR Manish J Shah for Mr.JP SHAH for Petitioner MR Prashant...

Decision: The reference is accordingly disposed of as not pressed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 76 of 1984 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE C.K.THAKKER and MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- INDUKUMAR C PATEL Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR Manish J Shah for Mr.JP SHAH for Petitioner MR Prashant Desai with MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE C.K.THAKKER and MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Date of decision: 23/06/98 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per C.K.Thakker, J) �The following question was referred for the opinion of this Court. "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in disallowing the interest of Rs.11,710/- paid by the assessee to M/s. Patel Brothers ?" 2.�Mr.Shah, Learned Counsel for the assessee under the instructions of the assessee states that he has instructions from the assessee not to press this reference in view of smallness of amount involved in Reference (Rs.11,710/-). 3.�In view of the above statement, in our opinion, the reference does not survive. The reference is accordingly disposed of as not pressed. No order as to costs. ���***** jitu
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan