Case Law › High Court › Indus Teqsite Private Limited v. Deputy...

Indus Teqsite Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Company Circle-Ii(3) 5[Th] Floor, Room

High Court 16 Jun 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Indus Teqsite Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Company Circle-Ii(3) 5[Th] Floor, Room
Date of order
16 Jun 2021
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Indus Teqsite Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Company Circle-Ii(3) 5[Th] Floor, Room, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 16.06.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.6543 of 2014andM.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2014 Indus Teqsite Private Limited,Represented by itsManaging Director Mr.S.Rangarajan,Plot H 9, Fourth Main Road, SIPCOT IT Part,Siruseri, Off Rajiv Gandhi Salai (OMR)Chennai – 603 103. ..Petitionervs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Company Circle-II(3)5[th] Floor, Room No.513, Wanaparthy Block,121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam,Chennai – 600 034. ..Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, tocall for the records on the file of the respondent as regardsre-assessment proceedings under Section 147 of the Income TaxAct 1961, for the AY 2006-07 pursuant to the impugned Noticeunder Section 148 of the Income Tax Act 1961 (PAN : AAAC16684D/2006-07) dated 28.3.2013 and quash the impugned Notice underSection 148 of the Income Tax Act 1961 (PAN : AAAC16684D/ 2006-07) dated 28.3.2013 issued by the respondent vis-a-vis re-assement proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act1961 for the AY 2006-07. For Petitioner:Mr.Vaibhav R Venkatesh For Responden :Mr.Prabhu Mukunth ArunkumarStanding counsel(Income Tax) O R D E RIn view of the orders passed in W.P.No.6542 of 2014, nofurther orders are required in this Writ Petition andaccordingly, this writ petition in W.P.No.6543 of 2014 standsdismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneouspetitions are closed. -s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS-IX) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar KakToDeputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Company Circle-II(3)5[th] Floor, Room No.513, Wanaparthy Block,121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam,Chennai – 600 034. W.P.No.6543 of 2014 RK(CO)SP(26/07/2021)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan