Industrial Cables (India) Limited, Rajpura v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala
High Court
27 Oct 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Industrial Cables (India) Limited, Rajpura v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala
Date of order
27 Oct 2009
Assessment year(s)
1979-80
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Industrial Cables (India) Limited, Rajpura v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Issue: Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of thecases, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the amountof Rs.
Decision: Reference is disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
ITR No. 145 of 1989 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
ITR No. 145 of 1989 (O&M)Date of decision: October 27, 2009
Industrial Cables (India) Limited, Rajpura ...Appellant Versus
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala
...Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOELHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH
Present: Mr. Animesh Sharma, Advocate, for the assessee.None for the revenue.
ORDER
At the instance of the assessee, the Income-tax AppellateTribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh, has referred the following twoquestions of law arising out of its order dated 22[nd] April, 1988 in crossappeals being I.T.A. Nos. 222 & 305 and cross objection 39 of 1985 relatingto the assessment year 1979-80, for the opinion of this Court:-
“1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,the Tribunal was right in law in holding that no weighteddeduction under Section 35B (1) (b) (viii) of the Income TaxAct, 1961 (for short 'the Act') is admissible on account of oceanfreight ?
2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of thecases, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the amountof Rs. 31,56,238/- on account of sale of import entitlementsrepresented receipts liable to income-tax and not capitalreceipt ?”
ITR No. 145 of 1989 (O&M)
In view of the judgment of the Full Bench dated 3.7.2009 in
Commissioner of Income-Tax Versus Roadmaster Industries of India(P.) Limited, [2009] 315 ITR 66 (P&H), the questions referred areanswered in favour of the revenue and against the assessee.
Reference is disposed of accordingly.
(ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE
October 27, 2009 prem
(GURDEV SINGH ) JUDGE
Note:- Whether this case is to be referred to the Reporter .....Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.