Case LawHigh Court › Industrial Devlopment Corporation v. Com...

Industrial Devlopment Corporation v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

High Court 08 May 2003 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Industrial Devlopment Corporation v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
08 May 2003
Assessment year(s)
1981-82
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Industrial Devlopment Corporation v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2003) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench "B", has referred the following question at the instance of the assessee for the opinion of this Court under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in respect of the Assessment Year 1981-82. "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 103 of 1990 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE K.M.MEHTA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- INDUSTRIAL DEVLOPMENT CORPORATIONVersus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 103 of 1990 MR BD KARIA, Advocate for MR RK PATEL for Petitioner MS. MAUNA BHATT, Advocate for MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and MR.JUSTICE K.M.MEHTA ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI) . The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench "B", has referred the following question at the instance of the assessee for the opinion of this Court under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in respect of the Assessment Year 1981-82. "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in upholding the order of the C.I.T. directing the ITO to exclude the sum of Rs. 1,94,285/- being the interest relatable to the earlier years from the figure of loss determined?" . When this Reference is called out, the learned counsel for the assessee states that the assessee does not press for the Reference. The question referred to us, therefore, remains unanswered as it is not pressed by the assessee. The Reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. ����[R.K. ABICHANDANI, J.] ����[K.M. MEHTA, J.] pirzada/-
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan