Case Law › High Court › Inincome Tax Appeal (L) v. M/S Van Oord...

Inincome Tax Appeal (L) v. M/S Van Oord Dredging & Marine Contractorsb.v

High Court 17 Jun 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

17 Jun 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Inincome Tax Appeal (L) v. M/S Van Oord Dredging & Marine Contractorsb.v, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.569 OF 2008 inINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2800 of 2008The Director of Income Tax(International Taxation).. Appellant Vs. M/s Van OOrd Dredging & Marine ContractorsB.V...Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for AppellantMr.P.Kaka with Mr.A.K.Jasani for Respondent CORAM : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan andA.V.Nirgude, JJDATED : 17th June, 2008 P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant andthe respondent. By this notice of motion, theappellant is seeking condonation of 459 days delaycaused in filing the appeal. 2. The appeal is filed against the I.T.A.T.order dt.29.3.06. The D.G.I.T.(IT) grantedapproval for filing the appeal on 5.5.06.However, the appeal came to be filed on 5.12.07i.e. almost after 16 months. The delay mainlywas draft memo of appeal was ready but could notbe filed in time due to shortage of stamp paper inoffice. We are not at all satisfied with thereasons given for condonation of delay. Nosufficient cause is made out for condonation ofdelay. Hence, Notice of motion stands dismissed. 3. In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion,Income Tax Appeal (L) No.2800 of 2007 also standsdismissed. {A.V.Nirgude, J)(Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.