Inincome Tax Appeal (L) v. M/S Mtz (Industries) Ltd
High Court
17 Jun 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Inincome Tax Appeal (L) v. M/S Mtz (Industries) Ltd
Date of order
17 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Inincome Tax Appeal (L) v. M/S Mtz (Industries) Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1447 of 2008
inINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.340 of 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax-1 ..Appellant
Vs.
M/s MTZ (Industries) Ltd
.. Respondent
Mr.A.S.Rao for AppellantMs.Aasifa Khan for Respondent
P.C.
CORAM : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan andA.V.Nirgude, JJDATED : 17th June, 2008
1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Bythis notice of motion, the appellant is seekingcondonation of 72 days delay caused in filing theappeal. For the reasons stated in the affidavitin support of the Notice of Motion, sufficientcause is made out for condonation of delay andthere is no case of inaction, negligence or wantof bonafide on the part of the appellant. Hence,the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms ofprayer clause (a).
{A.V.Nirgude, J)
(Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue