Initiating Officer), (Benami Prohibition),Room v. Preetha Krishnar/O
High Court
04 Mar 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Initiating Officer), (Benami Prohibition),Room v. Preetha Krishnar/O
Date of order
04 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Initiating Officer), (Benami Prohibition),Room v. Preetha Krishnar/O, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
CMP NO. 4761 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04-03-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. S. SUNDAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN
CMP NO. 4761 of 2025
in
CMA SR.No. 168569 of 2024
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
(Initiating Officer), (Benami Prohibition),Room No.02, Ground Floor, Income Tax Investigation Wing Building, 108, M.G. Road,Nungambakkam, Chennai - 034.
Vs
Preetha KrishnaR/o No.11, Shyamala Gardens, Akkarani,
..Appellant
ECR, Chennai ..Respondent
For Appellant: Ms.R.KesarFor M/s.M.Sheela, Spl. Public ProsecutorFor Respondent(s):
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble S.S.Sundar J.)
This Miscellaneous Petition is filed to condone the delay of 298 days in filing the
above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2. Learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the appellant submitted that
the appellant-department has given instructions to withdraw the appeal as the
department is decided to file a review before the Appellate Tribunal in terms of the
judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Union of India and Another Vs. M/s.
G.Anapati Dealcom Pvt Ltd (Review Petition [Civil] No. 359 of 2023 in Civil Appeal No. 5783/2022 dated 18.10.2024)
3. In view of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel, the delay of 298 days in filing the above appeal is condoned. Registry is directed to number the appeal immediately.
(S.S.SUNDAR J.) (C.SARAVANAN J.)
04-03-2025
ak
Note: Registry is directed to send the bundle to the PA Section today, immediately after numbering the appeal.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.