Case LawHigh Court › Innovators Façade Systems Limited P v. I...

Innovators Façade Systems Limited P v. Income Tax Officer, Circle-1, Thane & Ors

High Court 26 Mar 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Innovators Façade Systems Limited P v. Income Tax Officer, Circle-1, Thane & Ors
Date of order
26 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Innovators Façade Systems Limited P v. Income Tax Officer, Circle-1, Thane & Ors, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Digitallysigned bySHAMBHAVISHAMBHAVINILESHNILESHSHIVGANSHIVGANDate:2024.03.2719:58:51+0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8244 OF 2023 Innovators Façade Systems Limited PVersusIncome Tax Officer, Circle-1, Thane & Ors. …Petitioner …Respondents Mr. Govind Javeri, i/by Mr. Sushil Kumar, for Petitioner.Ms. Samiksha Kanani, for Respondents-Revenue. CORAM:K. R. SHRIRAM &DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.DATED:26[th] March, 2024 PC:- 1.After the Petition was heard for sometime, Mr. Javeri, oninstructions, sought leave of the Court to withdraw the Petition withliberty to raise all grounds in reply to be filed by Petitioner to thenotice received under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“theAct”). 2. All rights and contentions are kept open. The Assessing Officer(“AO”) shall pass orders in accordance with law on or before 30[th]June 2024 dealing with all contentions of Petitioner. Before passingany order, the AO shall give a personal hearing to Petitioner, noticewhereof shall be given at-least five working days in advance. 3.Petition disposed. 4.We clarify that we have not made any observation on themerits of the matter. (DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan