Case Law › High Court › Intec Corporation v. Principal Commissio...

Intec Corporation v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-11, New Delhi

High Court 06 Sep 2017 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

06 Sep 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Intec Corporation v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-11, New Delhi, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 31 + ITA 626/2017 INTEC CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr S. Vasudevan, Mr Shashank Sharma and Ms. Sangita, Advocates versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-11, NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through: None CORAM:JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH O R D E R% 06.09.2017 CM 32432/2017 (for withdrawal of appeal) 1. In view of the submissions made therein, the application is allowed and the Appellant is permitted to withdraw the appeal with liberty as prayed for. ITA 626/2017 2. Dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. S. MURALIDHAR, J. SEPTEMBER 06, 2017 rd PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.