Case Law › High Court › International Institute Of Bio Technolog...

International Institute Of Bio Technology And Toxcicology,Rep. By Its Director,P.k.sarangi v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions)Chennai Circle, Room

High Court 24 Feb 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
International Institute Of Bio Technology And Toxcicology,Rep. By Its Director,P.k.sarangi v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions)Chennai Circle, Room
Date of order
24 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
2018-19
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In International Institute Of Bio Technology And Toxcicology,Rep. By Its Director,P.k.sarangi v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions)Chennai Circle, Room, the High Court (2025) decided the matter under Section 2, Section 10, Section 154 of the Income-tax Act.

Decision: 24.02.2025 rst Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No To: 4/6 W.P.No.4823 of 2025and W.M.P.No5341 of 2025 The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Chennai Circle, Room No.303, 3[rd] Floor, 6.With the above observation, this writ petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

W.P.No.4823 of 2025and W.M.P.No5341 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 24.02.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLEMR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.No.4823 of 2025 and W.M.P.No5341 of 2025 International Institute of Bio Technology and Toxcicology,Rep. by its Director,P.K.Sarangi, S/o.Sankhali Sarangi,Aged 48 years,BDO Office Road, Padappai – 601 301,Kancheepuram (Dist.,) Tamil Nadu .. Petitioner Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions)Chennai Circle, Room No.303, 3[rd] Floor,Annex Building, Aayakar Bhavan,121 Mahatma Gandhi Road,Chennai – 600 034... Respondent Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records in PAN: /18-19 dated 06.01.2025 order u/s. 143(3) r.w.s 250 of the IT Act, on the file of the respondent relating to A.Y 2018-19 and quash the same. 1/6 For Petitioner For Respondent W.P.No.4823 of 2025and W.M.P.No5341 of 2025 : Mr.Baskar G : Mr.V.Mahalingam, Senior Standing Counsel ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to call for the records in PAN: /18-19 dated 06.01.2025 order u/s. 143(3) r.w.s 250 of the Income Tax Act, on the file of the respondent relating to A.Y 2018-19 and quash the same. 2.Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner preferred an appeal against the assessment order dated 04.03.2021, before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), claiming that the petitioner is entitled to claim exemption under Section 10(21) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as 'the IT Act'). The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) vide order dated 30.11.2023, held that the petitioner is entitled to claim exemption under Section 10(21) of the IT Act. Accordingly, the respondent gave effect to the order of the Commissioner of the Income Tax (Appeals) by an order dated 25.10.2024. While so, the respondent passed an order dated 06.01.2025, under Section 2/6 W.P.No.4823 of 2025and W.M.P.No5341 of 2025 154 r.w.s 143(3) of the IT Act, raising a demand of Rs.2,97,03,595/- stating that the an income of Rs.4,23,10,152/- was allowed to exempt mistakenly in the order dated 25.10.2024. He would further submit that the respondent supposed to issue notice under Section 154 (3) of the IT Act, before passing any order under Section 154 of the IT Act and hence, prayed to set aside the impugned order. 3.Mr.V.Mahalingam, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent after taking appropriate instruction has fairly submitted that before passing the impugned order dated 06.01.2025, no notice under Section 154(3) of the IT Act was issued to the petitioner. 4.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent and perused the materials available on record. 5.Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the 3/6 W.P.No.4823 of 2025and W.M.P.No5341 of 2025 petitioner and the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent, it is clear that no notice was issued before passing order of rectification under Section 154 of the IT Act. It is mandatory to serve the notice before passing such order. Therefore, admittedly there is violation of principles of natural justice in passing the impugned order dated 06.01.2025 and hence, the same is liable to be set aside. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 06.01.2025 is set aside with liberty to the respondent to initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with law, if necessary. 6.With the above observation, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 24.02.2025 rst Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No To: 4/6 W.P.No.4823 of 2025and W.M.P.No5341 of 2025 The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Chennai Circle, Room No.303, 3[rd] Floor, 6.With the above observation, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 24.02.2025 rst Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No To: 4/6 W.P.No.4823 of 2025and W.M.P.No5341 of 2025 The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Chennai Circle, Room No.303, 3[rd] Floor, Annex Building, Aayakar Bhavan,121 Mahatma Gandhi Road,Chennai – 600 034. 5/6 6/6 W.P.No.4823 of 2025and W.M.P.No5341 of 2025 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. rst W.P.No.4823 of 2025and W.M.P.No5341 of 2025 24.02.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan