International Taxation -3 v. Tata Nyk Shipping Pte Ltd
High Court
18 Mar 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
International Taxation -3 v. Tata Nyk Shipping Pte Ltd
Date of order
18 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In International Taxation -3 v. Tata Nyk Shipping Pte Ltd, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of the aforesaid, the instant two appeals fail and shall stand dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~87 & 88
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 148/2024, CM APPL. 12825/2024
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -
INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3 ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC with Ms. Deeksha Gupta, Adv.
versus
TATA NYK SHIPPING PTE LTD
..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aditya Vohra and Mr. Hardeep Singh, Advs.
88
+ ITA 162/2024 & CM APPL. 13774/2024 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX –
INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3 ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC with Ms. Deeksha Gupta, Adv. versus
TATA NYK SHIPPING PTE LTD.
..... Respondent
Through:
Mr. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Adv. with
Mr. Aditya Vohra and Mr. Hardeep Singh, Advs.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R18.03.2024
%
Mr. Bhatia, learned counsel appearing in support of the appeals
fairly concedes that the question of treaty shopping would not arise in the facts and circumstances of the present case and the questions posited would consequently and necessarily answered in light of the decision rendered by the Division Bench of the Court in Blackstone Capital Partners (Singapore) Vi Fdi Three Pte. Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (International Taxation) [(2023) 452 ITR 111]. The decision in Blackstone speaks of the impermissibility of going behind or questioning the Tax Residency Certificate [“TRC”]. The limited grounds on or circumstances in which a TRC may be questioned or doubted had been lucidly explained by the Supreme Court in UOI & Anr. vs. Azadi Bachao Andolan & Anr.[(2004) 10 SCC 1] and Vodafone International Holidays BV vs. UOI & Anr. [(2012) 6 SCC 613]. In the absence of any factual foundation having been laid in place or alluded to by the appellant and which would qualify the tests laid down in Azadi Bachao and Vodafone International,we are of the considered opinion that no substantial question of law arises.
In view of the aforesaid, the instant two appeals fail and shall stand dismissed.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.MARCH 18, 2024/neha
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.