International Taxation v. Administrator Of The Estate Of
High Court
17 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
International Taxation v. Administrator Of The Estate Of
Date of order
17 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In International Taxation v. Administrator Of The Estate Of, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal.
Issue: The question as formulated on behalf of the Revenue is as set out in para.4 (a) which reads as follows:- "a) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the ld.
Decision: Hence Appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.334 OF 2004
The Direcetor of Income Tax
(International Taxation)....Appellant
Vs.
Administrator of the Estate of
Late E.F. Dinshaw ....Respondent
Ms. P.P. Bhosale with Mr. B.M. Chatterjee
i/b. Pankaj Kapoor for the Appellant.
Ms. Beena Pillai i/b. D.M. Harishg & Co.,
for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATED: 17TH JULY,2007
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 17TH JULY,2007
P.C.:
P.C.:
. We have perused the impugned order. The question
as formulated on behalf of the Revenue is as set out
in para.4 (a) which reads as follows:-
"a) Whether on the facts and circumstances
of the case and in law, the ld. Tribunal
has erred in storing to the Assessing
Officer the issue of handing over of
possession of the properties being sold to
the purchasers, after admitting fresh
evidence in the form of tenancy agreements,
even though the said evidence had not been
produced before the Assessing Officer."
(-2-)
2. A perusal of the said question would show
that the challenge is to the Tribunal permitting
additional evidence and reverting the matter to the
Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. In our
opinion the said question would not amount
substantial question. Hence Appeal is dismissed.
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.