Case LawHigh Court › International Taxation v. Administrator...

International Taxation v. Administrator Of The Estate Of

High Court 17 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
International Taxation v. Administrator Of The Estate Of
Date of order
17 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In International Taxation v. Administrator Of The Estate Of, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal.

Issue: The question as formulated on behalf of the Revenue is as set out in para.4 (a) which reads as follows:- "a) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the ld.

Decision: Hence Appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

(-1-) MGN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.334 OF 2004 The Direcetor of Income Tax (International Taxation)....Appellant Vs. Administrator of the Estate of Late E.F. Dinshaw ....Respondent Ms. P.P. Bhosale with Mr. B.M. Chatterjee i/b. Pankaj Kapoor for the Appellant. Ms. Beena Pillai i/b. D.M. Harishg & Co., for Respondent. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATED: 17TH JULY,2007 J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 17TH JULY,2007 P.C.: P.C.: . We have perused the impugned order. The question as formulated on behalf of the Revenue is as set out in para.4 (a) which reads as follows:- "a) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the ld. Tribunal has erred in storing to the Assessing Officer the issue of handing over of possession of the properties being sold to the purchasers, after admitting fresh evidence in the form of tenancy agreements, even though the said evidence had not been produced before the Assessing Officer." (-2-) 2. A perusal of the said question would show that the challenge is to the Tribunal permitting additional evidence and reverting the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. In our opinion the said question would not amount substantial question. Hence Appeal is dismissed. (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan