International Taxation v. Ge Engine Services Inc
High Court
02 Nov 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
International Taxation v. Ge Engine Services Inc
Date of order
02 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In International Taxation v. Ge Engine Services Inc, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal.
Decision: Recording the above, the appeal is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~27
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 1209/2018
THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1
(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate.
versus
GE ENGINE SERVICES INC ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Rohit Garg and Mr. Aarush Bhatia, Advocates. Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
%
O R D E R02.11.2018
CM No. 45460/2018
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
CM No. 45461/2018
Delay in refiling is not opposed by the respondent-assessee. Accordingly, the application for condonation of delay is allowed.
ITA 1209/2018
Counsel for the parties state that the present appeal may be disposed of in terms of the order dated 01.06.2018 passed in ITA No. 661/2018, The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 (International Taxation) vs. General Electric Power Systems INC. It is stated that this would be in consonance with Sections 158A and 158AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, though these
provisions are not strictly applicable.
2. The question raised by the Revenue in these appeals relates to levy of interest under Section 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which issue is covered against them vide the judgment of this Court in Director of Income Tax (International Taxation) vs. GE Packaged Power Inc., (2015) 373 ITR 65 (Delhi).
3. The appeal against the said decision is pending before the Supreme Court as special leave to appeal has been granted.
4. Counsel for the parties state that the ruling by the Supreme Court would equally apply to the present appeal. Recording the above, the appeal is disposed of.
5. In case of any difficulty, it will be open to the parties to file an application in this appeal after the decision of the Supreme Court.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
NOVEMBER 02, 2018 MR
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.