Case LawHigh Court › Intimate Fashions (India) Pvt. Ltd.,517...

Intimate Fashions (India) Pvt. Ltd.,517 v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax,Corporate Circle - 2 (2),Chennai

High Court 28 Feb 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Intimate Fashions (India) Pvt. Ltd.,517 v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax,Corporate Circle - 2 (2),Chennai
Date of order
28 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Intimate Fashions (India) Pvt. Ltd.,517 v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax,Corporate Circle - 2 (2),Chennai, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 28.02.2020 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Rev.Appl.No.34 of 2020andC.M.P.No.5021 of 2020 Intimate Fashions (India) Pvt. Ltd.,517-519, Tiruppur - Kottamedu High Road,Nandhivaram Village,Guduvancheri - 603 202. Vs ... Applicant The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax,Corporate Circle - 2 (2),Chennai. ... Respondent PRAYER :Review Application filed under Section 114 of Civil Procedure Code read with Order XLVIII Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code to review the Order dated 10.01.2020 passed in T.C.A.No.17 of 2020 on the file of this Court. For Applicant : Mr.Srinath Sridevan For Respondent : Mr.Karthick Ranganathan, SeniorStanding Counsel. 1/4 Rev.Appl.No.34 of 2020 O R D E R (Order of the court was made by N.KIRUBAKARAN.J.,) This Review Application has been filed to review the Order passed by this Court on 10.01.2020 in T.C.A.No.17 of 2020 wherein this Court had directed the applicant / appellant to pay a sum of Rs.25 Lakhs within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this Order and that on such payment, there will be an order of stay till the disposal of the appeal. 2.Heard Mr.Srinath Sridevan, learned Counsel for the applicant and Mr.Karthick Ranganathan, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent. 3.Mr.Srinath Sridevan, learned Counsel for the applicant would submit that total amount demanded is Rs.1,98,90,582/-,in which the major portion is interest. Further, out of base tax amount of Rs.82,41,859/-, the appellant has already paid a sum of Rs.75 Lakhs. The balance amount which has to be paid is only interest. Therefore, he seeks to review the Judgment passed by this Court. 2/4 4.However, this Court is not inclined to review the order and this application is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. It is made clear that the condition imposed by this Court was based on the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case.(N.K.K.,J.) (P.V.,J.) 28.02.2020ayIndex: Yes/NoInternet: Yes/No 4/4 N.KIRUBAKARAN, J.ANDP.VELMURUGAN, J. ay Rev.Appl.No.34 of 2020andC.M.P.No.5021 of 2020 Dated:28.02.2020
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan