Intimate Fashions (India) Pvt. Ltd.,517 v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax,Corporate Circle - 2 (2),Chennai
High Court
28 Feb 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Intimate Fashions (India) Pvt. Ltd.,517 v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax,Corporate Circle - 2 (2),Chennai
Date of order
28 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Intimate Fashions (India) Pvt. Ltd.,517 v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax,Corporate Circle - 2 (2),Chennai, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 28.02.2020
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
Rev.Appl.No.34 of 2020andC.M.P.No.5021 of 2020
Intimate Fashions (India) Pvt. Ltd.,517-519, Tiruppur - Kottamedu High Road,Nandhivaram Village,Guduvancheri - 603 202.
Vs
... Applicant
The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax,Corporate Circle - 2 (2),Chennai.
... Respondent
PRAYER :Review Application filed under Section 114 of Civil Procedure Code
read with Order XLVIII Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code to review the Order dated
10.01.2020 passed in T.C.A.No.17 of 2020 on the file of this Court.
For Applicant : Mr.Srinath Sridevan
For Respondent : Mr.Karthick Ranganathan, SeniorStanding Counsel.
1/4
Rev.Appl.No.34 of 2020
O R D E R
(Order of the court was made by N.KIRUBAKARAN.J.,)
This Review Application has been filed to review the Order passed by this
Court on 10.01.2020 in T.C.A.No.17 of 2020 wherein this Court had directed the
applicant / appellant to pay a sum of Rs.25 Lakhs within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this Order and that on such payment, there will be an order of stay till the disposal of the appeal.
2.Heard Mr.Srinath Sridevan, learned Counsel for the applicant and
Mr.Karthick Ranganathan, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent.
3.Mr.Srinath Sridevan, learned Counsel for the applicant would submit that
total amount demanded is Rs.1,98,90,582/-,in which the major portion is interest.
Further, out of base tax amount of Rs.82,41,859/-, the appellant has already paid a
sum of Rs.75 Lakhs. The balance amount which has to be paid is only interest. Therefore, he seeks to review the Judgment passed by this Court.
2/4
4.However, this Court is not inclined to review the order and this application
is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
It is made clear that the condition imposed by this Court was based on the peculiar
facts and circumstances of this case.(N.K.K.,J.) (P.V.,J.) 28.02.2020ayIndex: Yes/NoInternet: Yes/No
4/4
N.KIRUBAKARAN, J.ANDP.VELMURUGAN, J.
ay
Rev.Appl.No.34 of 2020andC.M.P.No.5021 of 2020
Dated:28.02.2020
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.