Case LawHigh Court › Investigation Wing, Room v. The Income T...

Investigation Wing, Room v. The Income Tax Settlement Commission, Additional Bench, 640, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai-600 035

High Court 17 Jun 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Investigation Wing, Room v. The Income Tax Settlement Commission, Additional Bench, 640, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai-600 035
Date of order
17 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Investigation Wing, Room v. The Income Tax Settlement Commission, Additional Bench, 640, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai-600 035, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In the circumstances, this writ appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

W.A.No.2338 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17.06.2025 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN W.A.No .2338 of 2024 and C.M.P.No.16581 of 2024 The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central – 2, Chennai, Investigation Wing, Room No.301,3[rd] Floor, New No.46,Mahatma Gandhi Road,Chennai-600 034. .. Appellant vs 1.The Income Tax Settlement Commission, Additional Bench, 640, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai-600 035. 2.RPP Blue Metals, 156, N.G. Palayam, Mullamparappu, Erode, Tamil Nadu-638 115. PAN : .. Respondents Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 17.10.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.16794 of 2020. ____________ Page 1 of 4 For Appellant: Mr.A.P.Srinivas BabuSenior Standing Counsel For Respondents: Mr.A.S.Sriramanfor respondent No.2 JUDGMENT(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Mr.Sriraman states that the issue raised in this appeal is covered by a judgment of this Court in Sri Krishna Tiles and Potteries (Madras) Private Limited v. Commissioner of Wealth Tax and others[1]. 2. Mr.Srinivas, in fairness, states that the judgment speaks for itself. 3. In the circumstances, this writ appeal is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, interim application stands closed. (K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ.) (SUNDER MOHAN, J.) 17.06.2025 Index : Yes/NoNC:Yes/No 1Judgment dated 10.6.2025 in W.A.No.1841 of 2021 ____________Page 2 of 4 To The Income Tax Settlement Commission,Additional Bench,640, Anna Salai, Nandanam,Chennai-600 035. ____________ Page 3 of 4 ____________ Page 4 of 4 W.A.No.2338 of 2024 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICEANDSUNDER MOHAN,J. (sasi) W.A.No.2338 of 2024 17.06.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan